Press conferences and ribbon cuttings are designed to trick us into thinking that something monumental has happened. When a corporation opens a new hotel, we are made to believe that it is something really special, which it is not. We are made to believe that such an "event" is an event in the purest form of the word: a spontaneous intersection of events that results in the manifestation of real action.
Late Thursday afternoon, however, the House of Representatives witnessed something of a true event.
According to the Huffington Post article, House Republicans managed to summon enough votes to halt a $7.4 billion dollar bill that would've provided free medical care to those sickened by the events of 9/11. What Republicans took argument with was a procedural maneuver by Democrats that prevented the addition of amendments to the bill. This was appropriate, considering that Democrats were concerned that Republicans would tack on overly partisan amendments to a widely popular bill in order to sneak the measure in.
When the measure finally fell, Representative Anthony Weiner (D-NY) did what I believe Democrats should have been doing for quite some time. Video follows:
The remarks of observing procedural order were directed at Republican Representatives attempting to interject in the middle of Rep. Weiner's time (which is a violation of parliamentary procedure).
My 2 cents: while the GOP consistently touts "political correctness run amok" when discussing Democratic opposition to discriminatory legislation, I believe that the true meaning of the term has already reared its ugly head. The continued politeness and kowtowing to blatant, petulant, destructive, and Machiavellian obstructionism has done a great deal of damage to financial reform, health insurance reform, and public progress in general.
For my money, Anthony Weiner's speech was the first motivating thing the Democratic party has done in the past several months. Thank goodness C-SPAN's cameras were running when a true political event arose.
Friday, July 30, 2010
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
The Root of the Problem
I stumbled across an article from Crooks and Liars on Current.com this morning that I found very poignant.
What's fact got to do with it?
Go ahead, read up.
Okay, if you decided not to read then I'll give you the bullet points (in a bulleted list of course):
My problem, though, is with their proposed solutions. There really is no public accountability for news organizations, since any attempt to regulate them finds one lambasted in "1st amendment" arguments, there really is no natural, commercial way to regulate them, since the sensationalist, fear based reporting is what brings in the big bucks, and there is no natural psychological way to moderate them since, as C&L mentioned, the bias is built into us.
So I'm asking you guys, what can we do? As intelligent individuals, its not as difficult for us to question and re-shape our beliefs when presented with legitimate facts contrary to our already-held beliefs. But what about those mired a little deeper in the information quagmire with less tools to escape? Frankly, I think that improving self-esteem has already failed miserably, since it has created the most narcissistic generation of all time (extreme narcissists are even less likely to accept facts that contradict their subjective reality).
For my money, I think a cultural shift is required. The "information age" was supposed to bring about this utopia of enlightened minds but it has instead brought people's attention spans to their knees. According to recent studies (mentioned here for example) our attention span has actually regressed to the point that it resembles that of our primitive ancestors; analyzing every rustle and movement in search for predators. In order to counter-act the fast-paced news cycle, scanning of information, and deleterious effects of shallow conversation and thought, our culture must shift back from a rapid-fire information fueled one to a more pensive, more thoughtful, more deliberate one. That way people might instead analyze information more thoroughly as it comes to them, perhaps diffusing the hegemony of errant opinions based on flimsy facts in the first place.
Unfortunately, this one could be pretty hard to legislate.
But hell, what do you think? I believe we have enough intelligent people reading this blog to come up with a real solution. Just put your fingers on the keys and fire away.
What's fact got to do with it?
Go ahead, read up.
Okay, if you decided not to read then I'll give you the bullet points (in a bulleted list of course):
- In the age of information, one could reasonably believe that information and fact should undo erroneous beliefs
- However, new studies show that instead of undoing such beliefs, it actually strengthens them
- Furthermore, scientific studies show that fear and the perception of threat also prevents people from accepting fact as, well, fact
- C&L's solution then is to bring the hammer down on news corporations, since the bias that fuels this phenomenon is built into our psychology
- Another solution they present is to tap into findings showing that those with higher self-esteem are more comfortable changing their minds
My problem, though, is with their proposed solutions. There really is no public accountability for news organizations, since any attempt to regulate them finds one lambasted in "1st amendment" arguments, there really is no natural, commercial way to regulate them, since the sensationalist, fear based reporting is what brings in the big bucks, and there is no natural psychological way to moderate them since, as C&L mentioned, the bias is built into us.
So I'm asking you guys, what can we do? As intelligent individuals, its not as difficult for us to question and re-shape our beliefs when presented with legitimate facts contrary to our already-held beliefs. But what about those mired a little deeper in the information quagmire with less tools to escape? Frankly, I think that improving self-esteem has already failed miserably, since it has created the most narcissistic generation of all time (extreme narcissists are even less likely to accept facts that contradict their subjective reality).
For my money, I think a cultural shift is required. The "information age" was supposed to bring about this utopia of enlightened minds but it has instead brought people's attention spans to their knees. According to recent studies (mentioned here for example) our attention span has actually regressed to the point that it resembles that of our primitive ancestors; analyzing every rustle and movement in search for predators. In order to counter-act the fast-paced news cycle, scanning of information, and deleterious effects of shallow conversation and thought, our culture must shift back from a rapid-fire information fueled one to a more pensive, more thoughtful, more deliberate one. That way people might instead analyze information more thoroughly as it comes to them, perhaps diffusing the hegemony of errant opinions based on flimsy facts in the first place.
Unfortunately, this one could be pretty hard to legislate.
But hell, what do you think? I believe we have enough intelligent people reading this blog to come up with a real solution. Just put your fingers on the keys and fire away.
Monday, July 26, 2010
Oh Hey Guys!
Ladies and Gentlemen, after a brief hiatus from the blogging game I am proud to announce that I am back, like an employee opening the door to his office after a long vacation only to find an avalanche of papers and assignments.
In the time that I took off, I missed the Kagan confirmation, the Shirley Sherrod story, the progression of Financial Reform, the erection of a billboard in northern Iowa comparing Obama to Stalin and Hitler, and a gaffe by Jim Cornyn and Jeff Sessions revealing the RNC's intentions to maintain Bush era policies if Republicans find themselves in power within the next four to five years.
Like I said, stack of papers.
But my "vacation" wasn't without cause. To be quite honest, after several weeks of burying my face in political coverage and philosophy, I found myself disenchanted with the political game. My outlook was bleak, my expectations were low, and personally I had become quite depressed. Blogging, discussing, and reading about politics no longer summoned the enthusiasm it once had and I thought it was time to step back and gain some persepective.
So, I dedicated myself to more creative work, starting with music and film, eventually discovering a passion for photography and graphic design, and culminating in a willing return to politics. The fruits of my labor you ask?
Hope everyone is having a great summer and I look forward to seeing most of you very soon.
In the time that I took off, I missed the Kagan confirmation, the Shirley Sherrod story, the progression of Financial Reform, the erection of a billboard in northern Iowa comparing Obama to Stalin and Hitler, and a gaffe by Jim Cornyn and Jeff Sessions revealing the RNC's intentions to maintain Bush era policies if Republicans find themselves in power within the next four to five years.
Like I said, stack of papers.
But my "vacation" wasn't without cause. To be quite honest, after several weeks of burying my face in political coverage and philosophy, I found myself disenchanted with the political game. My outlook was bleak, my expectations were low, and personally I had become quite depressed. Blogging, discussing, and reading about politics no longer summoned the enthusiasm it once had and I thought it was time to step back and gain some persepective.
So, I dedicated myself to more creative work, starting with music and film, eventually discovering a passion for photography and graphic design, and culminating in a willing return to politics. The fruits of my labor you ask?
- The discovery of probably a dozen incredible albums (listed here)
- The addition of several new sites (under "Just for Funsies" on the homepage)
- The aforementioned discovery of photography (Flickr)
- The viewing of several Rifftrax (makers of Mystery Science Theater 3000)
- The viewing of Wim Wenders "Alice in den Städten" (I do not get film noir...)
- The realization that without a computer, I am an absolutely hopeless mess
Hope everyone is having a great summer and I look forward to seeing most of you very soon.
Monday, July 12, 2010
A Hiatus (On Purpose This Time)
Good morning patient readers!
I write this morning to inform you that, like the Daily Show and Colbert Report, I am going on a two week hiatus, effectively putting my talent and social status on par with Jon Stewart.
After a month and a half or so of polarizing political reading (as reflected by some of my recent "Marxism" posts...) I've decided to step outside the news blogs and gain some perspective. The world can seem like a pretty bleak place when you face this stuff head-on, day after day so I'm using material such as the following to regain my optimism and enthusiasm:
If you want to follow my journey, feel free to follow my music listenings at last.fm and posts on facebook (which have recently been overtaken by Farmville and Café World). I won't be incommunicado, simply a-political.
Stay classy everybody and, when the world appears on the brink of Armageddon, step outside for a sec. It's already done me a lot of good.
I write this morning to inform you that, like the Daily Show and Colbert Report, I am going on a two week hiatus, effectively putting my talent and social status on par with Jon Stewart.
After a month and a half or so of polarizing political reading (as reflected by some of my recent "Marxism" posts...) I've decided to step outside the news blogs and gain some perspective. The world can seem like a pretty bleak place when you face this stuff head-on, day after day so I'm using material such as the following to regain my optimism and enthusiasm:
If you want to follow my journey, feel free to follow my music listenings at last.fm and posts on facebook (which have recently been overtaken by Farmville and Café World). I won't be incommunicado, simply a-political.
Stay classy everybody and, when the world appears on the brink of Armageddon, step outside for a sec. It's already done me a lot of good.
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
The Progressive Realist
Hey everybody!
I added a new link to the sidebar for a "meta-blog" called The Progressive Realist. The site is an up-to-date aggregation of news and insight on American foreign policy, the brain child of Robert Wright. I selected the blog after sharing one of his articles, The Myth of Modern Jihad, which expressed a refreshing degree of insight and perspective regarding the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Check it out, let me know what you think, and leave some comments while you're here!
UPDATE
Recently added the poignant contemporary literary critique "Anthropomorpheyes" to "Just for Funsies". The title of this list should in no way detract from the inventive commentary and creative stylings of the author's hard work and dedication to plastic eyeballs.
I added a new link to the sidebar for a "meta-blog" called The Progressive Realist. The site is an up-to-date aggregation of news and insight on American foreign policy, the brain child of Robert Wright. I selected the blog after sharing one of his articles, The Myth of Modern Jihad, which expressed a refreshing degree of insight and perspective regarding the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Check it out, let me know what you think, and leave some comments while you're here!
UPDATE
Recently added the poignant contemporary literary critique "Anthropomorpheyes" to "Just for Funsies". The title of this list should in no way detract from the inventive commentary and creative stylings of the author's hard work and dedication to plastic eyeballs.
I Think They Doth Protest
...too much.
As Elena Kagan sits before a Congressional hearing for the next few days, defending her choices against constant Republican insinuations that she will "politicize" the high court, no one seems to be doing anything about one of the most prolific court-politicizers, Samuel Alito.
Salon brings to light what is just a one instance in a long chain of instances of Alito's conservative bend. My question is (already knowing the answer): how can Jeff Sessions and Lindsey Graham constantly harass Obama-n judicial nominees while overlooking the Bush administration's rampant judicial "reform"?
The truth is, one cannot simply overlook the practice of purposely tilting courts in one political direction or another. The saving grace of Democracy is the notion that the people may respond to injustice within the bounds of the law. If the law decides to rewrite the definition of "injustice", then the political power of the people wanes.
As Elena Kagan sits before a Congressional hearing for the next few days, defending her choices against constant Republican insinuations that she will "politicize" the high court, no one seems to be doing anything about one of the most prolific court-politicizers, Samuel Alito.
Salon.com: Sam Alito: The Tea Party justice
Salon brings to light what is just a one instance in a long chain of instances of Alito's conservative bend. My question is (already knowing the answer): how can Jeff Sessions and Lindsey Graham constantly harass Obama-n judicial nominees while overlooking the Bush administration's rampant judicial "reform"?
The truth is, one cannot simply overlook the practice of purposely tilting courts in one political direction or another. The saving grace of Democracy is the notion that the people may respond to injustice within the bounds of the law. If the law decides to rewrite the definition of "injustice", then the political power of the people wanes.
Monday, June 28, 2010
The Marxian Progression
This morning I woke up, went for a walk, came home, grabbed a shower and some water and sat down to check out the days news. Hoping to find some solace after the US national team lost in the World Cup, I went to one of my favorite user-driven news sites, Current, and found this story.
It didn't help.
This graph, constructed by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) using Congressional Budget Office (CBO) data tells a startling tale. I know that all of us here can intelligently consider the implications of this data, but I'd like to lay it out in plain terms just to drive home the point.
It didn't help.
This graph, constructed by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) using Congressional Budget Office (CBO) data tells a startling tale. I know that all of us here can intelligently consider the implications of this data, but I'd like to lay it out in plain terms just to drive home the point.
- While the wealthiest fifth have (successfully) thrown their money behind anti-taxation messages they've also successfully secured enormous gains in income (aided in the Bush presidency, no doubt, by deregulation and financial speculation).
- At the same time, they've managed to consistently squash the idea of "class warfare" (when brought up in the context of poor vs. rich) without the general public questioning where the topic even came from.
- Finally, they've managed to provide 80% of Americans enough token economic benefit to keep them satiate, leaving them ignorant to their continually diminishing piece of a much larger pie.
Well and truly, the Marxian system is bearing itself out. The emergence of a Bourgeoisie and a Proletariat through means of state and economic control is being realized.
As a young American trying to break into the world, I've noted on several occasions just how difficult it is to obtain property, prosperity, and means of production. While Kristen and I struggle to keep food on the table, millionaires (and beyond) have seen a 51% increase in their income! It is as if they need not make any attempt to hide the iniquity because the collective distraction of the American public is enough to hide the truth.
Call it a conspiracy. Criticize me for evoking Communist rhetoric. If you do, ask yourself: is it really so far-fetched to consider that, in a country that conveniently covers up all flaws under makeup, lights, and grandeur, that what appears to be casually may not be so under the surface?
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Glenn Beck's Blessing from the Vatican...Is Pure Bullsh*t
In this case, Stephen Colbert does all the talking needed.
| The Colbert Report | Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c | |||
| Prophet Glenn Beck - Father Guido Sarducci | ||||
| ||||
Probably one of the best pieces on the Colbert so far.
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Fake Wife, Fake Life, Real Consequences
It's June, Gay Pride month, and in honor of gay pride month, infoMania's Bryan Safi gives politicians a crisis plan in case they find themselves in a "sticky" situation (think about it...).
While hilarious, Safi evokes an important facet of America's roadblock on the way to progress: hubris.
I'm currently reading "Living in the End Times" by Slavoj Žižek (had to break out the character map for that one); the book is his treatise against Capitalism, detailing the downfall of the liberal government (read: totalitarian, detached, self-serving, not as in Democrats), and arguing that such a downfall allows us to find a new beginning through the failure. To open the discussion, he argues that admitting to one's own identity in all it's glory and tragedy is the first step to finding this new beginning.
Legislators facing such a "gay crisis" as Safi describes need take note of this. It would appear that they've gone so far down the path of hatred and discrimination that they deny what they are. It can largely be argued that they hate because they are unable to come to terms with who they are.
This hubris, this denial of what is right for the advancement of what you've constructed, affects more than just gay/bisexual/transgender legislators and legislation: this same kind of hubris has stalled health care legislation, climate change legislation, gay rights legislation, immigration reform, foreign policy, and the dreams of ordinary citizens in the process. The truth is, if legislators are to represent our wishes, they cannot do so if they are so cornered by fear as to prevent them from taking action at all.
Let this be a lesson to all of us. Be who you are and admit it to yourself, or start shipping Dawn to the Gulf.
UPDATE:
This story gives an example of the same activity in the church. It's nothing new, but it is still very important to acknowledge the toll this backwards discrimination takes, not only on the subjects of such prejudice, but on those who tout it.
While hilarious, Safi evokes an important facet of America's roadblock on the way to progress: hubris.
I'm currently reading "Living in the End Times" by Slavoj Žižek (had to break out the character map for that one); the book is his treatise against Capitalism, detailing the downfall of the liberal government (read: totalitarian, detached, self-serving, not as in Democrats), and arguing that such a downfall allows us to find a new beginning through the failure. To open the discussion, he argues that admitting to one's own identity in all it's glory and tragedy is the first step to finding this new beginning.
Legislators facing such a "gay crisis" as Safi describes need take note of this. It would appear that they've gone so far down the path of hatred and discrimination that they deny what they are. It can largely be argued that they hate because they are unable to come to terms with who they are.
This hubris, this denial of what is right for the advancement of what you've constructed, affects more than just gay/bisexual/transgender legislators and legislation: this same kind of hubris has stalled health care legislation, climate change legislation, gay rights legislation, immigration reform, foreign policy, and the dreams of ordinary citizens in the process. The truth is, if legislators are to represent our wishes, they cannot do so if they are so cornered by fear as to prevent them from taking action at all.
Let this be a lesson to all of us. Be who you are and admit it to yourself, or start shipping Dawn to the Gulf.
UPDATE:
This story gives an example of the same activity in the church. It's nothing new, but it is still very important to acknowledge the toll this backwards discrimination takes, not only on the subjects of such prejudice, but on those who tout it.
Monday, June 21, 2010
infoMania: An Oasis in a Media Desert
If being employed has taught me one thing above all others, it's that being broke sucks ass. If being unemployed has taught me another thing above all others (but below the ass sucking) it's that television sucks. I mean really sucks. The news, the sports analysis (how many times can you talk about one birdie putt?), the dramas, all of it sucks. It's indicative of a growing trend in the information age: that's that we generally do not need all this information. We deal with an onslaught of communication and entertainment in video, text, and sound and are we really any better for it?
That's where infoMania comes in. infoMania is a show parodying or highlighting the ridiculous onslaught of media and its effects on our society. It's young and hip, frequently using The Internet and you can even contribute content. If you have Current TV it's on Thursdays at 9 PM central.
And for those of you too lazy to check the thing for yourself, here's an episode. Enjoy!
That's where infoMania comes in. infoMania is a show parodying or highlighting the ridiculous onslaught of media and its effects on our society. It's young and hip, frequently using The Internet and you can even contribute content. If you have Current TV it's on Thursdays at 9 PM central.
And for those of you too lazy to check the thing for yourself, here's an episode. Enjoy!